Well, to begin to
say that I am in the first year of my degree, therefore, I could not say with
certainty the flaws that counts our curriculum, but of course, you don’t have
to be a genius to realize the different problems that affect our preclinical and
clinical companions.
I'll start by
talking about what affects me more than full, that is, the curriculum of the
first year. One of the main problems of the first-year curriculum’s is the high
academic overload, which makes the jump from high school to the university be colossal.
In fact, if you add the hours of personal study plus the hours you spend in the
university, your life would basically be summarized in to go to university, study at home and eat
while you are studying.
Other major problems
are the amount of content that is passed, in relation to the short time, which
makes us understand that today, clearly the university isn’t prioritizing
learning, but that "rewards" the ability to memorize the content.
It's not the same to learn than memorize.
Finally, and that I
find most serious, is the manipulation of the percentage of students who
reprove the subjects, I explain, most likely that many of you have ever heard,
at the beginning of the year, that a teacher says: "In this course, 20% of
my students fails". How does the teacher know this if the generation is
completely new? Suspect?
I totally agree with you
ResponderBorrar